Olerib Vision
Evaluates policy, identity, route, evidence and the requested action.
May permit, deny or escalate; does not actuate final control elements.Digital ecosystem · Runtime architecture
The physical process remains local. Digital services organise state, permission, evidence and traceability while local automation and allocated safety functions retain physical authority.
Architecture stack
Commercial services, supervisory governance and plant execution are connected, but they are not interchangeable. The map shows who may advise, who may permit and who physically acts.
Evaluates policy, identity, route, evidence and the requested action.
May permit, deny or escalate; does not actuate final control elements.Organizes validated state, configuration, orchestration and traceability across the platform.
Prepares and records released work; local control remains the execution authority.Structures measured feed data, compares it with the configured envelope and identifies required correction or review.
A project-specific envelope and qualified measurements are required before release.Evaluates a questioned signal or proposed action inside approved collective context and projects its governability across three evidence horizons.
Advises Olerib only; cannot authorise, deny, stop, verify or originate execution.Executes released sequences, provides operator interaction and enforces allocated interlocks and protective functions.
The PLC executes; independent safety retains its allocated veto and de-energise authority.Moves approved plant and fleet data between defined services for remote support and lifecycle visibility.
Connectivity is not a substitute for local control or site operating procedures.Supports analytics, diagnostics, deployment intelligence and commercial collaboration.
Advisory and commercial services have no plant command authority.Runtime at a glance
Inputs, digital gates, execution authority and recorded outputs remain visibly separated throughout the decision path.
The overview uses eight broad roles. The detailed architecture below separates the same work into fifteen named service engines.
| Runtime role | Functional responsibility | Authority boundary |
|---|---|---|
| FRNE | Structure and compare feed condition against the configured reference | Requires qualified measurement and a released envelope |
| State | Maintain the current configured state of modules, equipment, routes and material | State record is not physical confirmation unless linked evidence supports it |
| Route | Evaluate the intended path, lineup, isolation and resource availability | Local feedback and interlocks remain authoritative |
| Rules | Apply configured constraints, limits and applicable operating rules | Cannot override allocated safety functions |
| Execution | Sequence a permitted request for release to local automation | PLC executes; cloud and advisory services do not actuate |
| Safety | Evaluate digital permissives and monitor the status of allocated protections | SIS / ESD retains its allocated veto and de-energise authority |
| Convergence | Evaluate stability and movement toward a target using an approved basis | No predictive result is accepted without a qualified model or test basis |
| Alarm | Classify events, preserve context and present required intervention | Operators and site procedures govern accountable response |
Decision progression
A failed gate pauses progression and directs the process to a defined correction, rejection, safe state or accountable operator decision.
Operative runtime architecture
The engine set is grouped by feed and equipment truth, configuration, authorisation, evidence and fleet support. Names describe intended responsibilities; project implementation still requires released software, interfaces and test evidence.
Structures feed measurements, compares them with the configured reference and records required correction or review.
Reconciles available signals and records freshness, disagreement, drift and the evidence used to accept a value.
Compares commanded position with available position, flow and pressure feedback.
Holds the released operating window and kit-specific limits for the selected application.
Checks the requested path against configured valves, isolation, flush and recirculation routes.
Maintains named module states such as prepare, run, pause, clean, isolate and fault.
Translates an authorised correction into a bounded setpoint request for local automation.
Checks the digital permissive record while PLC and independent safety functions retain their allocated authority.
Classifies events and presents the operator with the available context and required response.
Associates identity and role with the set of requests an operator may submit or acknowledge.
Records when cleaning is due and the evidence required before a subsequent configuration is released.
Links source, configuration, request, decision, execution record and available outcome evidence.
Records the policy and evidence considered when a request is permitted, denied or escalated.
Organizes approved operating history for comparison, service and engineering review across deployed units.
Supports supervised remote assistance within the site's access, cyber-security and authority rules.
FRNE · Feed Reference Neutralisation Engine
FRNE is presented as a deterministic feed-reference workflow. It does not infer an approved process envelope: that envelope must come from qualified project work.
Olerib Foresight · Advisory runtime
Foresight evaluates one questioned signal or proposed action inside the available approved context and projects its expected governability across three evidence horizons. It returns a bounded recommendation to Olerib Vision—not permission and never a plant command.
Token language
A token is a structured record, not a physical asset or a performance claim. Together the families describe what was observed, requested, permitted, executed and verified.
Measured feed value with unit, source, quality and time.
Proposed bounded correction or operational action.
Released target linked to the evidence and action that justified it.
Available sensor, laboratory or reconciliation evidence.
Configured material path, including isolation, flush and recirculation.
Freshness, agreement and status of the contributing measurement.
Named operating state visible to the relevant runtime functions.
Permission, role and boundary applicable to the requested action.
| State | Required evidence | Setpoint status | Feed progression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outside envelope | One or more accepted parameters outside released limits | Blocked | Blocked |
| Correction planned | Bounded response proposed; authority and model basis open | Pending | Blocked |
| Converging | Approved model or test basis predicts entry into target window | Pending | Blocked |
| Neutral / in window | Accepted parameters inside target window and stable for the specified criterion | Ready for review | Project inputs required |
| Released | Required policy, route, state and verification gates satisfied | Issued | Released to local execution |
| Maintaining | Monitoring remains valid inside the released operating window | Active | Continue with monitoring |
Digital ecosystem products
Information can move across the ecosystem; command authority does not move with it. Each service has a named role and an explicit boundary.

Olerib Vision originated with Adapt but remains a standalone product that can be integrated with third-party industrial environments.
Understand Olerib Vision →Feedstock and tailings mapping, partner and opportunity research, regional demand context
No process authorityFeedstock and capacity coordination, solution and kit collaboration
No process authorityTelemetry, fleet visibility, configuration delivery, maintenance signals and supervised remote support
Transport only; local authority remainsDiagnostics, unit and hub comparison, capacity context and advisory forecasting
Recommendation onlyState, alarm, permissive and operating-window presentation
Operator requests; PLC executesPolicy evaluation, evidence context and allow / deny decision
No final-element actuationCollective context, three evidence horizons, governability comparison and a traceable recommendation
Advice only; Olerib independently decidesPattern detection, scenario support and summaries using governed data
No permission or execution authority| Service | Primary role | Information handled | Authority boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADI / Adapt Radar | Market and deployment intelligence | Feedstock and tailings mapping, partner and opportunity research, regional demand context | No process authority |
| Adapt Exchange | Industrial collaboration layer | Feedstock and capacity coordination, solution and kit collaboration | No process authority |
| Adapt Connect | Connected data backbone | Telemetry, fleet visibility, configuration delivery, maintenance signals and supervised remote support | Transport only; local authority remains |
| Adapt Intelligence / Fleet Intelligence | Analytics layer | Diagnostics, unit and hub comparison, capacity context and advisory forecasting | Recommendation only |
| Adapt HMI | Operator interface | State, alarm, permissive and operating-window presentation | Operator requests; PLC executes |
| Olerib Vision | Governance and witness | Policy evaluation, evidence context and allow / deny decision | No final-element actuation |
| Olerib Foresight | Bounded advisory engine | Collective context, three evidence horizons, governability comparison and a traceable recommendation | Advice only; Olerib independently decides |
| AI / deployment advisory | Concept-scope advisory service | Pattern detection, scenario support and summaries using governed data | No permission or execution authority |
Intended operational value
Each intended outcome is paired with the evidence needed before it can become a public performance claim.
| Intended outcome | Architecture contribution | Evidence required before claiming performance |
|---|---|---|
| More stable qualified feed | Explicit feed envelope, deviation handling and release state | Representative feed campaign, acceptance criteria and trend data |
| Lower transition risk | Named route, state, permission and cleaning gates | HAZOP / risk review, cause-and-effect, FAT / SAT and operating procedures |
| Operator accountability | Identity, role, acknowledgement and linked decision record | Access-control design, audit policy and record-retention verification |
| Faster troubleshooting | Source-to-outcome digital thread and time-correlated events | Commissioned instrumentation, time synchronisation and service records |
| Repeatable commissioning | Controlled configuration, recipes and acceptance gates | Approved commissioning plan and comparable site evidence |
| Fleet comparison | Consistent data definitions and approved cross-unit records | Data-quality rules, comparable operating context and governance approval |
| Reduced dependence on tacit knowledge | Released procedures, configured envelopes and visible decision context | Training, competency assessment and controlled-document review |
| AI-ready analytics | Structured, traceable data for advisory models | Model validation, monitoring and a documented non-actuation boundary |
Control boundary
Released sequences and interlocks run at the plant, not through an internet-dependent control loop.
Policy and evidence can permit, deny or escalate a request without directly driving a valve or motor.
No public SIL level, zero-latency, immutability, cyber-security or universal performance claim is made without a released conformity basis.
From architecture to project
Navigator creates a preliminary functional flowsheet and records the missing project inputs. The digital architecture is then engineered around the selected process and authority model.